This report shows that, even if the UN Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers is a non-binding instrument, the principles analysed in this report constitute binding law in domestic jurisdictions through case law of national courts, as well as case law of international tribunals. The primary focus of the international developments section is the WTO's General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). You can download the paper by clicking the button above. In addition, as defence counsel, the applicant had a duty to defend her client's interest in a robust manner, subject to judicial control. In this case, the Supreme Court declined to extend the principle established inSalduz v Turkeyto questioning that took place before a person was detained at a police station. Such a rule does not exist in Scotland. Judges, lawyers and prosecutors play a major role in ensuring that victims of human rights Opinion of AG Poiares Maduro in the Case C-305/05 - Ordre des barreaux francophones and germanophone and Others, Effective Criminal Defence in Latin America, OFFICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Human Rights and Law Enforcement A Trainer's Guide on Human Rights for the Police UNITED NATIONS, Homo Dignita: Theory and Practice of Human Rights, Reprisals against Human Rights Defenders Who Cooperate with the UN System, Effective Criminal Defence in Eastern Europe, Safety of journalists Guidebook Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, Update on the Rule of Law for Human Rights in ASEAN: The Path to Integration, Human Rights Resource Centre for ASEAN, Jakarta, 2016, Eradication of Extremism Through Curriculum Development, Promoting and Protecting Minority Rights A Guide for Advocates, The Landscape of the Legal Professions in Europe and the USA: Continuity and Change, Compendium of key human rights documents of the African Union (2013), Access to Justice in Ethiopia: Towards An Inventory of Issues, International Commission of Jurists Report: Obstacles to Justice in India Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity, Access to justice for persons with disabilities: From international principles to practice, Access to Legal Assistance in Malta - Mapping the availability of Legal Assistance for the protection of fundamental rights in Malta, Protecting Brazilians against Torture: second edition updated and expanded, Human Trafficking: Joint UN Commentary on the EU Directive on Human Trafficking - A Human Rights-Based Approach, Review of the legislative framework and jurisprudence concerning the right to adequate food in Nepal, Ius Comparatum -Global Studies in Comparative Law The Right to Counsel and the Protection of Attorney-Client Privilege in Criminal Proceedings A Comparative View, World Bank Multi-Donor Trust Fund for justice sector support : cross country comparison of regional mechanisms for delivery of free legal assistance. Previously, in the case ofChaparro lvarez and Lapo iguez v Ecuador, the IACtHR had found that the state had breached article 8 ACHR in failing to provide adequate and competent defence counsel where that counsel was physically absent during the interrogation of the alleged victim. The principle of lawyer-client confidentiality was generally found to be accepted in these jurisdictions, except Japan. We analysed case law of domestic high courts, as well as of regional human rights courts and the UN Human Rights Committee. When he did appoint private lawyers, they were not permitted to access classified information on the grounds of not having been granted the requisite security clearance, and were harassed by state authorities, including by means of complaints to their respective bar associations. InMadhav Hayawadhanrao Hoskot v State of Maharashtra, the Supreme Court of India held that the right of the indigent to a competent, court-appointed lawyer was not limited to the trial stage but included appellate remedies. This crucial role has been highlighted by all inter-governmental human rights systems. Academia.edu uses cookies to personalize content, tailor ads and improve the user experience. In 2012, the Colombian Constitutional Court considered whether a lawyer's freedom to disclose confidential information in these circumstances was unconstitutional on the basis that it undermined the lawyer-client relationship. The ECtHR also attached particular importance to the special role of human rights defenders in promoting and defending human rights, including in close cooperation with the Council of Europe. The Supreme Court also ruled inFrancis Coralie Mullin v The Administrator, Union Territory of Delhi and Othersthat a person in preventative detention does have the right to consult a lawyer "for the purpose of preparing his representation, advising him as to how he should defend himself before the Advisory Board and preparing and filing a habeas corpus petition or other proceedings for securing his release". Lawyers, in protecting the rights of their clients and in promoting the cause of justice, shall seek to uphold human rights and fundamental freedoms recognized by national and international law and shall at all times act freely and diligently in accordance with the law and recognized standards and ethics of the legal profession. Executive Summary This research was conducted with the objective of assessing the practice, gaps and challenges in the provision of legal aid service in Ethiopia, as well as the level of networking and coordination among the various legal aid providers. While the right to confidentiality between a lawyer and their client does not feature prominently in complaints before the ACtHPR and the African Commission, judgments and decisions in relation to violations of article 7(1)(c) of the African Charter sometimes reference this right. The accused was only subsequently permitted access to a state-appointed lawyer who failed to act independently to protect the accused's interests. The IACtHR reiterated this position inRuano Torres et al v El Salvador, since the right to a defence "must necessarily be exercised from the moment a person is accused of perpetrating or participating in an illegal act and ends when the proceeding ceases, including, where applicable, the enforcement phase". However, the Basic Principles are held in high regard and are broadly accepted. This case was cited by the High Court of Malaya (Pulau Pinang) in the subsequent case ofSaul Hamid v Inspector Abdul Fatah bin Abdul Rahman[1999]. The court did not make any express reference to the UN Basic Principles but agreed with the complainants and upheld the claim. Areas covered by ethical standards include: Independence, honesty and integrity. The HR Committee found that the state had violated Mr Saidov's rights to justice and a fair trial and should not have been subjected to arbitrary arrest as guaranteed under the ICCPR. The Supreme Court did not seek to define what constitutes a good defence or adjudicate on what arguments a lawyer should make. Governments shall further ensure that all persons arrested or detained, with or without criminal charge, shall have prompt access to a lawyer, and in any case not later than forty-eight hours from the time of arrest or detention. It is the duty of the competent authorities to ensure lawyers access to appropriate information, files and documents in their possession or control in sufficient time to enable lawyers to provide effective legal assistance to their clients. In response, the lawyer filed a lawsuit to argue that he should not be compelled to do so. Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer. A similar statement was made inCivil Liberties Organisation, Legal Defence Centre, Legal Defence and Assistance Project v Nigeria, where the African Commission noted that the HR Committee had prescribed that "the accused person must be able to consult with his lawyer in conditions, which ensure confidentiality of their communications. The requirements of the special cell were clarified as being equivalent to any state unit for provisional segregation that is considered to constitute decent accommodation with adequate facilities. Governments and professional associations of lawyers shall promote programmes to inform the public about their rights and duties under the law and the important role of lawyers in protecting their fundamental freedoms. In a judicial review case, the complainant, an advocate general of the High Court of Kenya, sued the attorney general on the basis that recently published guidelines which required the engagement of any external lawyers by government agencies to be approved by the attorney general were unconstitutional. Lawyers, for their part, merely speak in their own name and on behalf of their clients.". However, he alleged that he was not assisted by a lawyer and that obtaining such assistance was complicated. As a corollary of a complainant's right to due process and to a defence, access to a lawyer is an essential part of the Colombian legal system. This page was printed on 30/06/2023 and the up-to-date version can be found online at https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/topics/research/un-basic-principles-on-the-role-of-lawyers. In later civil proceedings against the same (former) client, he was named as a witness for the details of that conversation. Whereas the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights recalls the obligation of States under the Charter to promote universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and freedoms. 16. The Supreme Court inCadderfollowed the reasoning inSalduzand, because national laws may attach consequences to the response of a suspect to the initial stages of police interrogation which influence the prospects of any subsequent defence. The Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers, set forth below, which have been formulated to assist Member States in their task of promoting and ensuring the proper role of lawyers, should be respected and taken into account by Governments within the framework of their national legislation and practice and should be brought to the attention of lawyers as well as other persons, such as judges, prosecutors, members of the executive and the legislature, and the public in general. The court held that, while there is a constitutional right to a lawyer in a criminal case and the state is obliged to guarantee access to a lawyer and thus to a defence, the fulfilment of this obligation is not subject to all preferences of the accused. Both the African Commission and the ACtHPR regard denial of access to a lawyer as a serious violation of the right to a defence. Therefore, it should be primarily for a lawyer to assess the relevance and usefulness of a defence argument without being influenced by the potential "chilling effect" of even a relatively light criminal sanction or an obligation to pay compensation for harm suffered or costs incurred. There have been instances of the Indonesian courts making indirect references to the UN Basic Principles, such as the Constitutional Court in a case from 2019, where it was argued that the lack of a mechanism to implement the right to immunity of a lawyer contradicted the Constitution. The IACtHR recognised "the appointment of a defence counsel for the sole purpose of complying with a procedural formality would be tantamount to not having a technical legal representation; therefore, it's imperative that the defence counsel act diligently in order to protect the procedural guarantees of the accused and thereby prevent his rights from being violated". The African Commission found there had been a violation of article 7(1)(c) of the African Charter and noted that states have the obligation to "ensure that lawyers are able to carry out their profession freely, independently and without fear of bodily or mental harm. This right includes several constituent elements, including the right of every person charged with a criminal offence to have access to a lawyer of their own choosing and to defend themselves in person or with legal assistance. Both quantitative and qualitative research methods including literature review, primary data collection through field visits and stakeholders consultations were employed to undertake the assessment. The Chilean Constitution guarantees equal protection before the law for all and guarantees every person the right to a defence. However, the court did note in a later case that the restriction on assets unrelated to the alleged crime, and which are needed to retain a lawyer of one's own choosing, violates an accused's right to have a fair opportunity to secure such a lawyer. The right to a lawyer of one's own choosing is an important right, acknowledged by the Colombian courts. 6. Patriotic and National Observances, Ceremonies, and Organizations, Title 37. Regarding the right to a defence, the Federal Supreme Court considered the right of access to case files by a lawyer who is not acting in the relevant proceedings. InBashira v State of UP, the Supreme Court held that the lawyer appointed at the state's expense to defend an accused must be allowed sufficient time to prepare, and that failure to give such lawyer sufficient time to prepare vitiated the trial. McGowan v Bconcerned the validity of the accused waiving their right of access to a lawyer. 28th Colloquy on European Law: The Independence , Tanzania Human Rights Defenders Coalition [THRDC], Promoting the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Central Asia: Institutional Experiences and the Way Forward, Promoting the Rights of the Persons with Disabilities in Central Asia: Institutional Experiences and the Way Forward, Abul Hasnat Monjurul KABIR, marianne schulze, The Right to Counsel and the Protection of Attorney-Client Confidentiality, The Right to Know Our Rights: International law obligations to ensure international human rights education and training (2012), OHCHR, The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights IBA, International Bar Association - Human Rights in the Administration of Justice: A manual and facilitator's guide on human rights for judges, prosecutors and lawyers (2003), Early access to legal aid in criminal justice processes: a handbook for policymakers and practitioners, Improving pretrial justice: The roles of lawyers and paralegals, HUMAN RIGHTS MANUAL FOR PALESTINIAN LAWYERS: Identifying, Investigating and Prosecuting Human Rights Violations, Assessment of Legal Aid in Ethiopia: A Research Report and Proceeding of the National Workshop of Legal Aid Providers, Assessment of Legal Aid in Ethiopia: A Research Report, INDIGENTS ACCESS TO EFFECTIVE REPRESENTATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS: CASE STUDY IN ADAMA, Minorities in the criminal justice system, The Independence of the Bars and their Relationship with the Public Authorities, THE WORLD RULE OF LAW MOVEMENT AND RUSSIAN LEGAL REFORM The Moscow City Chamber of Advocates, Adopting Regulatory Objectives for the Legal Profession, A COMPENDIUM OF REGIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS MECHANISMS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS IN TANZANIA, Access to Justice and Legal Aid in Bangladesh, Recursivity in Legal Change: Lawyers and Reforms of Chinas Criminal Procedure Law, Human Rights in Patient Care: a Practitioner Guide, Tracking Expression: Monitoring, Reporting and Addressing Human Rights Violations During Elections, COMPENDIUM OF LAWS GOVERNING CSOs IN TANZANIA. In one case, the Japan Fair Trade Commission (JFTC) had raided the complainant's business premises and seized certain documents, including communications between the complainant and its lawyer, and subsequently: The complainant filed a claim to revoke the JFTC's decision in respect of the communications between the complainant and its lawyers on the basis that such communications should be protected by lawyer-client confidentiality. In one case before the Federal Court of Justice, the complainant was interrogated by the police as the suspect of a robbery. The importance of the confidentiality of lawyer-client communications has also been emphasised in several cases in Germany. As a result, the HR Committee found that the state had violated the applicant's right under the ICCPR to be tried in their presence and the right to defend themselves and not to be compelled to testify against themselves or to confess guilt. 18. "The physical assault of a lawyer in the premises of the court is an impossible attack on the independence of the judiciary and the rule of law in the state.". A lawyer, who has been entrusted with a secret in the context of a relationship with a client, must decide after the death of their client, according to their best judgment, whether they are entitled to refuse testimony in civil proceedings. The Court of Cassation (Civil Division) upheld the decision of the Court of First Instance and the Court of Appeal that the testimony of the lawyers of one of the parties to the proceedings could not be accepted against that party. The importance of this right has been considered in several cases and the jurisprudence has significantly evolved over the course of the 20th century. In a Scottish case,Wright v Paton Farrell, a client brought a claim against his former solicitors alleging negligence in the conduct of his defence in a criminal trial, which had led to his conviction, resulting in an alleged miscarriage of justice. In order to fulfil fully the lawyer's role as the counsel and representative of the client, the lawyer must be independent and preserve his lawyer's professional and intellectual independence with regard to the courts, public authorities, economic powers, professional colleagues and the client, as well as regarding the lawyer's own interests. InCadder v Her Majesty's Advocate, a Scottish case ultimately decided by the UK Supreme Court, it was held that the police had violated the rights of the complainant under article 6 ECHR. However, the court also clarified that the lawyer "cannot supply answers or whisper hints or otherwise interfere with the course of questioning except to intercept where intimidatory tactics are tried, caution his client where incrimination is attempted and insist on questions and answers being noted where objections are not otherwise fully appreciated. A similar conclusion was reached by the Supreme Court when it rejected an argument that a complainant had not received due process on the basis that his previous lawyer did not use all the legal arguments available. Other groups of beneficiaries include the elderly, PLWHA and inmates of detention facilities. Accessibility of legal aid services is analyzed in terms of legal awareness, geographic proximity, program coverage and financial cost of accessing the service. Its purpose is to assess the process of reform among lawyers in emerging democracies. In many jurisdictions, a lack of access to case files may constitute a violation of the right to prepare a defence (for example, in Chile). Nonetheless, where a complainant does not attend a hearing and their privately appointed lawyer is also absent (when that lawyer's absence cannot be justified), the Supreme Court established that a judge could designate a public defender. The IACtHR concluded a violation of the right to access to a lawyer of one's own choosing, as well as the right to communicate freely and privately with them, established in article 8(2)(d) ACHR. The Basic Principles are considered to be a soft-law instrument (as opposed to hard law): they are not legally binding. It's clear from these judgments that lawyers' communication with their clients are offered a high degree of protection. The Supreme Court held that governments shall ensure that efficient procedures and responsive mechanisms for effective and equal access to lawyers are provided for all persons within their territory and subject to their jurisdiction. Governments shall ensure that all persons are immediately informed by the competent authority of their right to be assisted by a lawyer of their own choice upon arrest or detention or when charged with a criminal offence. In a decision of the Supreme Court, the court noted that all persons are entitled to call upon the assistance of a lawyer of their own choosing to protect and establish their rights. The measure was revoked and the individual was incarcerated again. Where a lawyer is provided but the adequacy of the defence is in question, the IACtHR has been reluctant to determine that this amounts to a breach of the right to a fair trial enshrined in article 8 ACHR. Accepting such testimony would be in contravention of a number of legislative provisions. Whilst the petition was ultimately rejected by the court, the court made extensive reference to the UN Basic Principles supporting the principle of the independence of the legal profession. At a regional level in Europe, recommendations issued by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe "on the freedom of exercise of the profession of lawyer" specifically address the legal profession. Readers of the Manual (published in 2003) are offered basic information on international human rights law and the jurisprudence of universal and regional bodies and national courts. However, recent Japanese case law shows that courts are applying this principle in practice (depending on the circumstances of the case). 29. Article 6 ECHR protects every individual's right to a fair trial, which includes several rights, such as the right to access and communicate with a lawyer of their own choosing. The accused should have had access to a lawyer from the first questioning. Lawyers should be able to counsel and to represent their clients in accordance with established professional standards without any restrictions, influences, pressures or undue interference from any quarter.". The court held that the ECtHR's case law does not establish that an individual who acts of their own free will in waiving their right to a lawyer must have access to legal advice before they can waive their rights, and there can be an effective waiver of the right to due process in such cases. 1. Brazilian case law also guarantees, pursuant to that statute, the right of a lawyer to access case files, even where they are not a legal representative in a case. The research focused on how the following principles and rights are understood: The jurisdictions analysed were divided per region: Case law of the United Nations HR Committee and the African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights refers to intimidation and physical violence directed against lawyers in several countries. Although the UN Basic Principles is itself a non-binding instrument, this report shows that some of these principles are binding on states by virtue of the interpretation (by regional tribunals) of human rights treaties that they have ratified, as well as through binding domestic case law. The complainant was not permitted to contact a lawyer prior to his deportation, which occurred on the same day as the notice given of the order of expulsion. It was developed by the ABAs Central European and Eurasian Law Initiative (ABA/CEELI), now a division of ABA ROLI, together with its other regional divisions in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East/North Africa. This includes taking steps that are inherent to the legal proceedings, such as challenging evidence, questioning and cross-examining witnesses and expert witnesses. For example, this court annulled the decision of an appellate court in the context of a criminal execution on the basis that there was no defence, in breach of article 59 of the Sentence Execution Act. In Colombia and Chile as well as the IACthR courts do not comment on the quality of a defence (except that significant inaction by a lawyer can lead to a violation of the right to a defence and due process, see for example Colombia). Wright v Paton Farrellwas a judgment rendered by the Court of Session in Scotland, which distinguished itself from the judgment rendered by the English House of Lords inArthur JS Hall and Co v Simons, in 2000, where it was held that it was no longer necessary for lawyers to enjoy immunity in civil proceedings. The court agreed with the complainant that these actions interfered with the principle of lawyer-client confidentiality and stated that, while a search is not necessarily unlawful, privileged material could not be admitted as evidence without consent of the client and could not be seized under a search warrant. Such consultations may be within sight, but not within the hearing, of law enforcement officials. In addition, the defence lawyers were subject to threats and harassment because of their involvement in the case.